The primary user of a cell phone has standing to bring a
TCPA claim irregardless of whether he is the subscriber of the account
according to the Middle District of Florida.
In Soulliere v. Central Florida
Investments, Inc., C.A. No. 8:13-cv-02860 (M.D. Fl. Mar. 24, 2015), the consumer filed suit against a time
share resort, its homeowner association, its management services firm and the
management firm’s parent company alleging violations of the TCPA. The consumer alleged that the management firm
violated the TCPA by calling his cell phone without prior express consent. The consumer alleged the remaining defendants
were vicariously liable for the calls.
In cross motions for summary judgment a key issue was
whether the consumer had standing to sue.
Defendants contended that because the consumer’s employer provided the
cell phone to the consumer for his use, the consumer was not the subscriber and
therefore not the called party. In a
fairly detailed analysis, the court acknowledged that the Eleventh Circuit has
held that the “called party” means the subscriber of the cell phone
service. The court however, cautioned
against construing the term too narrowly, noting that the subscriber may
transfer primary use of the telephone to another person thereby authorizing
that primary user to consent to being called.
The court therefore construed the TCPA to provide standing to the
primary or regular user of the cell phone.
Like other cases, this case leaves open whether the standing provided to
the primary user mutually excludes standing to the subscriber.
No comments:
Post a Comment