Mortgage servicers need to take note of a decision issued by
an Illinois District Court a few weeks ago.
In ruling on the servicer’s motion to dismiss, the Northern District of
Illinois held that a mortgage servicer’s transfer letter was a communication in
connection with collection of a debt. Snyder v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, No.
14 C 8461 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 27, 2015). In
that case, Snyder received two letters from Ocwen on the same date. The first letter was a Notice of Servicing
Transfer. The second was a demand letter
for payment, containing the 30 day debt validation notice. While Ocwen did not
contest the demand letter was sent in connection with the collection of a debt,
it did contest that the Notice of Servicing Transfer was sent in connection with
collection of a debt and was therefore covered by the FDCPA. While
the court agreed that “in isolation, the transfer letter does not appear to be
connected to debt collection,” it did not review the letter in isolation. Instead, the court noted that the context of
the communications was a factor to be considered as well. Because Snyder alleged the transfer letter
was sent on the same day as the demand letter, the court determined that there
were sufficient facts alleged to support the inference that the transfer letter
was sent in connection with the collection of the debt. Mortgage servicers and others sending out
required notices should take note, therefore, that notices sent within a close
time frame with demand letters may support a similar inference and should make
efforts to insure their notices also comply with the FDCPA, if appropriate.
No comments:
Post a Comment